As I sip on a hot cup of joe, thought I'd pontificate for fun.
When it comes to routes, it seems my mind is always looking foward to "what next"? I've pondered this n' that, but really haven't come up with anything truly solid. Very much in the running is to go ahead and build the 2nd installment of the Ozark Lines concept, the Arkansas River & Northern.
However, I would like to keep my route product selection somewhat evenly divided between diesel and steam. Building the AR&N next would mean I have 4, possibly 5, steam products (The StLNA, NAP, ON, and the future AR&N) and only two diesel (the A&O and upcoming LNE Pack). So, IMHO, it really behooves me to make a diesel route next. (Of course, as always: "We shall see".)
This much I DO know:
* Needs to be a reasonable length. (Takes forever to single handedly build a route over 30 miles long.)
* Needs to have good "interest".
* Seems to me that curvy (as opposed to long tangents) is good. Less chance for boredom after one has "explored" the route. Plus, I think it makes the headout view more fun (looking to the rear and watching your train snake along behind you.)
* It needs to be "do-able".
By "do-able", I primarily mean an ability for ME to become familiar with the route and find/procure usable photo textures.
Well, over the months/weeks, I've taken a gander at several. During that time, a few of them indicated promise:
* Some Appalachian routes
* The Rutland
* The Tennessee RR
Then the problems hit.
Appalachian routes:
It dawned on me that Marc is doing one, as is All-Aboard. (Can't wait for both, by the way!)
The Rutland:
Though an old interest of mine since about 1974, looking at it with the idea of replicating it in MSTS, I quickly learned why it went broke: There's a lot of track with little to do in between the major points. The most likely candidate was the Rutland/Bellows Falls portion. However, again, lots of work with little play value once finished. Plus, there's the familiarity thing as well as photo textures. The books I recently purchased go a long way toward orienting me with the "way things were", but still not quite enough. How much $ can I afford to spend on books? Not enough. Plus, the Rutland/Bellows Falls portion is something like 52 miles long. Length was one of the reasons the LNE project fell on hard times. Just too much time to populate it to the levels of detail I'm accustomed to. To further eliminate the Rutland was the density at the key towns: Way too much yard trackage. This eats up CPU resource like no tomorrow. (Yet another reason for the demise of the LNE project.)
The Tennessee RR:
Neat area. Far enough removed from the area that Marc and Rich are doing to be a possibility. Definitely curvy. Neat power (Alco's). Unfortunately, it too, was long on mileage and short on play value. Dense trackage wasn't a problem. ENOUGH trackage was! Again, 50 plus miles... but simply not enough play value at all. Further, there is scant little "hard information" on the fool thing. What sounded like a good candidate turned south in a hurry.
And so it has gone. I would look at a potential route (spending the $ if necessary to truly evaluate it), only to find some issues that become terminal.
But, however unlikely as it sounds, there's this funky little Rock Island branch in the Ouachita's* that sounds quite interesting.
Who would have thought that the Rock Island had a nifty little mountain line and ran neat trains in the pine covered hills of south Arkansas? Well, they did. And not only did they run some trains there, they ran some very interesting trains there.
In it's favor would be the fact that I've been there on several ocassions, as well as it being within striking distance (a two hour drive). Also in it's favor is that I have an old friend that worked that line for many years, and can thus give first-hand input as to its operational nuances and detailed input in regards to industries.
Another plus: Mileage from the Malvern connection to Hot Springs is about 23 miles. Twenty three miles that contain a surprising amount of interest and industry/interchange.
So far, so good.
If you would like to take a peek at it, the best way I would suggest is by using Topozone and following the route to Hot Springs, Arkansas. As you do, note the interst along the way, and bear in mind there was even MORE there in the tentative target era of late 1960's.
If you want to take a look at it, do this:
1. Go to www.topozone.com.
2. Type in "Malvern" and select "AR" in the search fields.
3. Click on "Malvern" once the search result page loads.
4. After the map loads, select the "Large" size and hit "Update Map".
You're now set to start tracing the line. Begin by heading north out of Malvern. Once at Butterfield (junction), the main to Hot Springs swings west. However, while at Butterfield, exlpore the mud spur that leaves due north from there. This industry would be included should this route be selected. (BTW, the line to the east is the Rock Island's track to Little Rock, AR.)
When finished exploring the mud mine, follow the main west/northwest to Hot Springs, and note all the semi-heavy industry along the way, as well as the switchback interchange on the south edge of Hot Springs. Be aware that there were customers in Hot Springs proper that do not appear on the map track. My old friend Bill has already clued me in... I just need a refresher is all.
Oh, by the way, during the target era, this line used RS3's a lot, so there's a potential for some nice BLW engines to serve it. Also, I could bend the prototype a bit and possible assign some Rock Island RS1's there too?
So, there you have it. A nice potential route.
Of course, as with all things VSC: "WE SHALL SEE."
* Startling looking Native American name, eh? It's locally pronounced "WASH uh taw", however, I suspect the more accurate pronunciation is "o WASH uh taw".